Impact of State Aid Monitoring
Source: Dispatch of the Federal Council on the Bilateral III package, Chapter 2.2.11–2.2.12 (pp. 249–265)
PDF of the Dispatch
¶ Summary
The introduction of state aid monitoring has moderate personnel and financial implications for the Confederation and the cantons. The Confederation estimates approximately 10 notifiable or GBER-covered aid measures per year, with set-up costs of CHF 500,000 and running costs of CHF 200,000 per year. The economic impact is positive: strengthened competition and equal framework conditions. Constitutionality is based on Art. 54, 95 and 101 of the Federal Constitution.
¶ Impact on the Confederation
¶ Personnel resources
| Position | FTE | Task |
|---|---|---|
| COMCO aid chamber | 7.5 | Examination procedures, opinions, register |
| SECO (competence centre) | 2.0 | Coordination, advisory, international contacts |
| Total | 9.5 |
¶ Financial impact
| Item | Amount | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Set-up costs | CHF 500,000 | 2031/2032 (one-off) |
| Running costs | CHF 200,000/year | From 2033 |
| Personnel costs COMCO | Within COMCO global budget | Ongoing |
| Personnel costs SECO | Within EAER global budget | Ongoing |
¶ Estimated case numbers
- 5 notifiable aid measures per year (requiring simple or in-depth examination)
- 5 GBER aid measures per year (exempt from notification, but subject to registration)
- Significantly fewer cases than in EU Member States of comparable size
- Reason: narrow scope (only 3 agreements)
¶ Impact on the cantons
¶ Personnel resources
| Phase | FTE | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Set-up phase | 8.5 | 2–3 years |
| Ongoing operations | 2.0 | Permanent |
¶ Cantonal tasks
- Inventory: recording of existing cantonal aid
- Notification: notification of cantonal aid within the scope
- Adaptation: cantonal legislative adaptations where necessary
- Advisory: advice for municipalities and cantonal offices
¶ Costs
- Advisory services chargeable: COMCO advisory services are invoiced
- Legislative adaptations: cantonal adaptations at own expense
- Training: participation in federal training programmes
¶ Economic impact
State aid monitoring has predominantly positive economic effects:
¶ Positive effects
- Strengthened competitiveness: equal framework conditions for CH and EU undertakings
- Market access: securing internal market access in the three sectors
- Price discipline: consumers benefit indirectly from fair competition
- Investment certainty: clear rules increase planning security for undertakings
- Location attractiveness: transparent aid policy as a location factor
¶ Possible restrictions
- Administrative burden: notification obligation for aid-granting bodies
- Examination periods: 2–12 months waiting time for notifiable aid
- Adaptation needs: existing aid regimes must be reviewed
The Federal Council assesses the net effect as clearly positive, particularly due to the secured market access.
¶ Environmental impact
State aid monitoring theoretically also affects the promotion of renewable energy, as the Electricity Agreement falls within the scope:
¶ Secured exceptions
- Decarbonisation: aid for climate protection and decarbonisation is explicitly excluded
- Renewable energy: promotion of renewable energy falls under GBER exceptions
- Energy efficiency: energy efficiency measures are exempted
- Network infrastructure: as SGEI, largely excluded from monitoring
¶ Assessment
- Swiss energy and climate policy is not restricted by aid monitoring
- Numerous exceptions safeguard the room for manoeuvre
- The GBER covers virtually all relevant environmental and energy aid
¶ Social impact
The Federal Council notes that aid monitoring has no notable social impact:
- Public service remains entirely outside the scope
- Social institutions are not affected
- The education system is not affected (except where directly related to the 3 agreements)
- The healthcare system is not affected
¶ Constitutionality
State aid monitoring is based on several constitutional foundations:
| Constitutional article | Content | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 54(1) FC | Foreign affairs (federal competence) | Conclusion of the international aid protocols |
| Art. 95(2) first sentence FC | Private economic activity | Authorisation to regulate competition |
| Art. 101(1) FC | External economic policy | Safeguarding the interests of the Swiss economy |
¶ Federal competence
- Cross-sectoral: the Confederation is competent for the entire scope of the D-SAMA
- Inclusion of cantonal aid: the Confederation can rely on Art. 95(2) first sentence FC to also monitor cantonal aid
- No constitutional amendment required: existing constitutional bases are sufficient
¶ Monitoring of cantonal aid
- The Confederation can, based on Art. 95(2) first sentence FC, regulate the monitoring of cantonal aid
- This is constitutionally permissible as it concerns securing internal market access
- The cantons retain their autonomy in granting aid
- Only monitoring (not aid policy itself) is centralised at the federal level
¶ WTO compatibility
State aid monitoring is compatible with WTO subsidy rules:
- SCM Agreement: the provisions are compatible with the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
- Most-favoured-nation clause: no discrimination against other WTO members
- National treatment: equal treatment of domestic and foreign undertakings within the scope
- No conflicts: the bilateral aid provisions complement the WTO regime without violating it
¶ Key points
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| FTE Confederation | 9.5 (7.5 COMCO + 2 SECO) |
| Set-up costs | CHF 500,000 (one-off) |
| Running costs | CHF 200,000/year |
| FTE cantons | 8.5 (set-up) → 2.0 (ongoing operations) |
| Cases per year | ~5 notifiable + ~5 GBER |
| Economy | Net effect positive (market access) |
| Environment | No restriction (exceptions secured) |
| Society | No notable impact |
| Constitutional basis | Art. 54, 95, 101 FC |
| WTO | Compatible with SCM Agreement |
¶ References
- Dispatch of the Federal Council on the Bilateral III package, Chapter 2.2.11–2.2.12, pp. 249–265 (PDF)
- Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation (FC; SR 101), Art. 54, 95, 101
- Draft State Aid Monitoring Act (D-SAMA)
- WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement)
- Report on the results of the consultation on the Bilateral III package