State Aid Monitoring Act (D-SAMA)
Source: Dispatch of the Federal Council on the Bilateral III package, Chapter 2.2.7 (pp. 164–170)
PDF of the Dispatch
¶ Summary
The State Aid Monitoring Act (D-SAMA) is a new federal act in 10 chapters governing the procedures for monitoring state aid in Switzerland. COMCO receives a specialised aid chamber as an independent monitoring authority. The procedure comprises a notification obligation, a simple examination (2 months) and, where necessary, an in-depth examination (up to 12 months). Opinions are non-binding. Legal protection is provided through Swiss courts. The Act enters into force only 5 years after the entry into force of the aid protocols.
¶ Structure of the Act
The D-SAMA is divided into 10 chapters:
| Chapter | Content |
|---|---|
| 1 | General provisions – purpose, scope, definitions |
| 2 | Monitoring authority – COMCO aid chamber, composition |
| 3 | Notification procedure – notification obligation, deadlines, exceptions |
| 4 | Simple examination – preliminary examination within 2 months |
| 5 | In-depth examination – detailed investigation, up to 12 months |
| 6 | Opinions – non-binding assessment |
| 7 | Transparency – publication, register |
| 8 | Existing aid – inventory, transitional provisions |
| 9 | Legal protection – appeals, jurisdiction |
| 10 | Final provisions – entry into force, transitional periods |
¶ COMCO aid chamber
The aid chamber is a new specialised unit within the existing Competition Commission:
¶ Composition
- Chair: led by a member of COMCO
- 2 members: cantons are involved in preparing the election
- Expertise: specialisation in state aid law (EU and CH)
- Independence: free from directives, analogous to the existing COMCO structure
¶ Why COMCO?
- Proven institution with experience in competition law
- Existing infrastructure and expertise
- International recognition as an independent authority
- Synergies with cartel supervision
- Broad support in the consultation
¶ Procedure overview
The examination procedure follows a three-stage process:
¶ 1. Notification
- Obligation: aid within the scope must be notified before being granted
- Exceptions: de minimis aid and GBER aid are exempt from notification
- Content: description of the measure, recipient, amount, purpose
¶ 2. Simple examination (2 months)
- The aid chamber examines whether the measure constitutes aid within the meaning of the Act
- Examination of compatibility with the exception provisions
- Deadline: 2 months from complete notification
- Result: opinion or opening of an in-depth examination
¶ 3. In-depth examination (up to 12 months)
- Opened when the simple examination does not allow a conclusive assessment
- Comprehensive investigation with hearing rights
- Deadline: up to 12 months (extendable in justified cases)
- Result: non-binding opinion
¶ Opinions
A central feature of the Swiss system is the non-binding character of the opinions:
- The aid chamber issues a technical assessment
- The opinion is not legally binding (unlike in the EU, where the Commission adopts binding decisions)
- The aid-granting authority (Confederation, canton, municipality) decides autonomously whether to follow the opinion
- In case of non-compliance: potential consequences within the dispute settlement mechanism
¶ Legal protection
Legal protection is provided exclusively through Swiss courts:
- Cantonal courts: appeal to cantonal courts (depending on the aid-granting authority)
- Federal Supreme Court: final instance
- No EU jurisdiction: no access to the ECJ for Swiss aid cases
- Standing: affected undertakings and competitors may file an appeal
¶ Entry into force and transitional periods
| Timepoint | Event |
|---|---|
| T+0 | Entry into force of the aid protocols |
| T+0 to T+5 | Transitional period: establishment of the chamber, training, inventory |
| T+5 | D-SAMA enters into force, aid monitoring becomes operational |
| Ongoing | Regular reporting and review |
The 5-year transitional period allows for:
- Building up personnel capacity (7.5 FTE at COMCO)
- Adoption of implementing ordinances
- Recording of existing aid
- Training of the authorities concerned (Confederation, cantons, municipalities)
¶ Alternatives considered and rejected
The Federal Council examined and rejected several alternative approaches:
| Alternative | Reason for rejection |
|---|---|
| Subsidies Act (SubA) | Covers only federal subsidies, not cantons/municipalities; different regulatory purpose |
| Internal Market Act (IMA) | Focused on inter-cantonal market access, not on aid control |
| Constitutional amendment | Disproportionate for the limited scope; politically unnecessary |
| 27 cantonal authorities | Non-uniform, inefficient, not equivalent under international law |
| Existing federal authority (SECO) | Lack of independence, as part of the federal administration |
¶ Tasks/finance coordination
- Federal level: independent monitoring authority (COMCO aid chamber), not 27 cantonal authorities
- SECO competence centre: support and coordination (2 FTE)
- Financing: through the ordinary federal budget
- Departmental ordinance EAER: technical details regulated at ordinance level
¶ Key points
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of law | New federal act (D-SAMA) |
| Structure | 10 chapters |
| Authority | COMCO aid chamber (independent) |
| Cantonal participation | In the election of the 2 members |
| Simple examination | 2 months |
| In-depth examination | Up to 12 months |
| Opinions | Non-binding |
| Legal protection | Swiss courts (no ECJ) |
| Entry into force | 5 years after the protocols |
¶ References
- Dispatch of the Federal Council on the Bilateral III package, Chapter 2.2.7, pp. 164–170 (PDF)
- Draft State Aid Monitoring Act (D-SAMA)
- Federal Act on Cartels and other Restraints of Competition (CartA; SR 251)
- Federal Act on the Internal Market (IMA; SR 943.02)
- Federal Act on Financial Aid and Compensation (Subsidies Act, SubA; SR 616.1)