Legal aspects and referendum question
¶ Legal aspects and referendum question
Chapter 4 of the dispatch (pp. 1030-1041) covers the constitutionality of the package, the referendum question and the four federal decrees by which Parliament is to approve the package.
¶ Summary
The package is submitted to Parliament in the form of four federal decrees. All four are subject to the optional referendum under Art. 141(1)(d) of the Federal Constitution. A mandatory referendum is not required - this is consistent with established constitutional practice and was confirmed by the people in 2012.
¶ The four federal decrees
| No. | Designation | Content |
|---|---|---|
| FD1 | Stabilisation | Institutional solution, AFMP update, land transport |
| FD2 | Internal market development | Electricity, food safety, new MRA areas |
| FD3 | Cooperation | Programmes (EUPA), health, EUSPA, parliaments |
| FD4 | Swiss contribution | CCA, cohesion, migration |
¶ Optional referendum
All four federal decrees are subject to the optional treaty referendum under Art. 141(1)(d) of the Federal Constitution:
- 50,000 signatures or 8 cantons can demand a referendum
- Deadline: 100 days after official publication
- Vote: simple popular majority (no cantonal majority required)
¶ No mandatory referendum
The package is not subject to a mandatory referendum. Justification:
- No accession to an organisation for collective security (Art. 140(1)(b) FC)
- No accession to a supranational community (Art. 140(1)(b) FC)
- Switzerland is not joining the EU - the agreements are bilateral treaties
Popular vote 2012: on 17 June 2012, 75.3% of voters rejected the popular initiative "International treaties: let the people decide!" which demanded a mandatory referendum for all important international treaties. The people thus confirmed the optional referendum system.
¶ Constitutionality
The constitutional basis of the package:
| Provision | Content | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 54 FC | Foreign affairs | General federal competence |
| Art. 184 FC | Treaties with foreign states | Federal Council's treaty-making power |
| Art. 166(2) FC | Parliamentary approval | Approval by National Council/Council of States |
| Art. 141(1)(d) FC | Optional referendum | Popular vote possible |
Constitutionality is affirmed by the Federal Council:
- Dynamic adoption of law is constitutional, as Switzerland does not automatically adopt law but takes a sovereign decision (with consequences for non-adoption)
- Dispute settlement with the CJEU role is constitutional, as Switzerland acts under international law
- The Swiss contribution falls within Parliament's financial competence
¶ Relationship with international law
The package is consistent with:
- WTO law: no violation of MFN principles
- EFTA Convention: compatible with EFTA obligations
- Bilateral Agreements I/II: partially replaced, partially supplemented
- Human rights: ECHR compliance guaranteed
¶ Parliamentary procedure
- Federal Council: adoption of the dispatch (completed)
- Committee deliberation: FAC-N and FAC-S examine the proposal
- First council: one chamber deliberates first (likely the National Council)
- Second council: the other chamber deliberates subsequently
- Resolution of differences: in case of divergences between the councils
- Final vote: both councils vote
- Referendum deadline: 100 days after publication in the Federal Gazette
- Popular vote: if a referendum is demanded
¶ Key points
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Federal decrees | 4 (FD1-FD4) |
| Referendum | Optional (Art. 141(1)(d) FC) |
| Mandatory referendum | Not required |
| Signatures | 50,000 or 8 cantons |
| Voting majority | Simple popular majority |
| Constitutional basis | Art. 54, 184 FC |
| Popular vote 2012 | 75.3% against mandatory referendum |
¶ References
- Dispatch of the Federal Council on the Switzerland-EU package, chapter 4 (pp. 1030-1041), FedGaz 2025
- Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation (FC), Art. 54, 140, 141, 166, 184
- Popular vote of 17 June 2012, popular initiative "International treaties: let the people decide!"
- Opinion of the Federal Office of Justice on constitutionality, 2025