¶ Independence and Sovereignty
Summary: A core argument of the supporters: the initiative protects Switzerland from a creeping abandonment of neutrality through executive decisions and preserves foreign policy independence. Following Finland's and Sweden's NATO accession, Switzerland would be one of the last strictly neutral states.
¶ 1. NATO Rapprochement Since 2022
Supporters argue that NATO cooperation has been intensified without sufficient democratic legitimation [1]:
- PfP since 1996, ITPP 2025-2028, Sky Shield, NATO office Geneva
- Art. 54a para. 2 would make NATO membership unconstitutional
¶ 2. Democratic Legitimation
The sanctions decision of 28 February 2022 was a Bundesrat decision without a popular vote. The initiative would constitutionally restrict such decisions [2]. Note: Position paper of the initiative committee
¶ 3. Unique Status
Following NATO accession by Finland (2023) and Sweden (2024), Switzerland is the only European state that is neither a NATO nor EU member and remains strictly neutral [3].
¶ 4. Counter-argument
Opponents warn that the initiative would inappropriately restrict the Bundesrat's freedom of action in a rapidly changing security situation (see Disadvantages: Freedom of Action).
¶ References
[1] DDPS (2025). ITPP 2025-2028. [Open Access]
[2] neutralitaet-ja.ch (2024). Argumentarium. Note: Position paper of the initiative committee
[3] swissinfo.ch (2025). What does the Neutrality Initiative want? [Open Access]
Last updated: March 2026